<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EndGame Public Relations, LLC &#187; news release distribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/tag/news-release-distribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.endgamepr.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>News Release Distribution Review 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2010/02/22/news-release-distribution-review-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2010/02/22/news-release-distribution-review-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mullen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Relations Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online News Release Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO PR Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news release distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endgamepr.com/?p=1293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the third installment of my running review of online news release distribution sites. If you&#8217;re finding these reviews for the first time, you should know that I&#8217;ll update this post as best I can throughout the year as sites change their offerings.  Previous editions of my review can be found here and here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the third installment of my running review of online news release distribution sites. If you&#8217;re finding these reviews for the first time, you should know that I&#8217;ll update this post as best I can throughout the year as sites change their offerings.  Previous editions of my review can be found <strong><a href="../blog/2007/04/14/review-online-news-release-distribution-services/">here</a></strong> and <a href="../blog/2008/10/23/online-news-release-distribution-review-updated/"><strong>here</strong></a>.</p>
<p>This post has been a long time coming.  Client work and family life keeps getting in the way, but the online distribution universe changes so fast, and I&#8217;ve received so much goodwill as a result of the previous two versions of my online news release distribution reviews that I had make the time to write this update.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at a some good reasons to distribute your news releases online:</p>
<ol>
<li>By including a link in your release, you&#8217;re building inbound links to your web site.</li>
<li>Your news is being spread beyond the boundaries of your web site, increasing the odds of it being seen by your audience.</li>
<li>There is the possibility that it will be seen by new media or traditional media, leading to coverage from these outlets.  This isn&#8217;t something I ever count on, but it does sometimes happen.</li>
</ol>
<p><em>Disclaimer: There have been occasions where I have been given free &#8220;try out&#8221; release distributions. I do accept these because they allow me to sample different services, but I do my best not to let them sway my judgment in the review.  I consider it the same as a product reviewer accepting a sample product.  Disclaimers about specific services can be found within their reviews.</em></p>
<p>So, which is the best place to distribute your <a href="../news">news releases</a> to reach your goals? Below is a review of what I consider the best of the best, both free and paid. Feed free to add your own via comments!</p>
<p><span id="more-1293"></span></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Premium News Release Distribution</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/"><img style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0px;" src="http://media.prnewswire.com/en/images/topbar/prn_logo.gif" alt="" width="132" height="86" /></a><strong></strong><strong><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/"></a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PR Newswire (PRN)</span></a> </strong><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Varies, starting at $170 for a 400 word release<br />
<strong>Review:</strong> PR Newswire has been around in one form or another for more than 55 years.  They market themselves as being a mainstay among reporters and news organizations, and are recently pushing their ability to get news to bloggers via their opt-in distribution lists.  They also do a good job of distributing your release for use on other websites.  Your release will rank well on Google News for your keywords, and you’ll get plenty of quality backlinks.</p>
<p>The problem with PR Newswire has always been cost. They have a yearly fee that you have to pay for the privilege of paying more to post your releases.  They have been known to waive that fee for small businesses, so be sure to ask if you qualify.  Releases start at $170 for distribution on their city or state wire, with an additional charge for every 100 words after that. That’s for a short release of 400 words, though, and they charge you for each word after that.   At that price, the distribution to the media is limited.  If you want distribution to nationwide media, you’ll pay almost $650 for a single release.  With all of this said, I do think PR Newswire does a great job getting the word out to the media, and as I’ll say in a number of cases during this review — you get what you pay for.</p>
<p><a href="http://businesswire.com"><img class="alignnone" style="border: 0pt none;" title="bw-logo" src="http://www.endgamepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bw-logo.jpg" alt="bw-logo" width="194" height="86" /></a><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/"><strong><br />
BusinessWire</strong></a></span><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Varies, starting at $180 for the first 400 words, or $175 for EON distribution<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>Business Wire has become my &#8220;go to&#8221; service for clients who have the money to pay for premium distribution. As with PR Newswire, their service is not cheap.  A basic citywide distribution will cost you at least $180 for the first 400 words, with an additional charge for every 100 words after that.</p>
<p>A basic release from BusinessWire will generate quality links for your release, and plenty of them.  The version of your release on the Business Wire site will rank on Google and Google News, but I&#8217;ve never been overly impressed with how well it ranks.  Generally speaking, the sites they distribute TO will rank better than the actual Business Wire version.  The good news is that Business Wire has a long list of sites that automatically will run your release, and after your distribution they will send you a link that will show you all of those sites.</p>
<p>One thing I should also note is that releases I have posted on Business Wire HAVE resulted in legitimate coverage on blogs and other new media sites.  What I mean by this is that rather than just posting the release verbatim, the bloggers or new media journalists have rewritten it or contacted me to learn more.</p>
<p>New for 2010 from Business Wire is a different pricing plan for their <a href="http://eon.businesswire.com/"><strong>EON</strong></a> release distribution.  The EON platform, launched several years ago, is designed with social media and SEO in mind.  EON releases rank well on Google and Google News.  You can include images and videos, and style your release using HTML.  Previously, EON was an add-on to standard geographic distributions, but starting January 1, 2010, you can purchase it separately for $175.  A word of caution, however: with an EON release, your release is NOT distributed to Business Wire&#8217;s online partners.  It will only be posted on Business Wire&#8217;s site.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prweb.com/"><img style="border: 0pt none; margin: 7px 0px;" src="http://ww1.prweb.com/images_v4/prw_logo.jpg" alt="" width="163" height="51" /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong></strong><strong><br />
PRWeb</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost:</strong> Packages range from $80 to $360<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>When PRWeb was launched in 1997, its owners seemed to realize that releases would become more than a tool for sending news to the media.  They were correct, as releases are now a means of pushing news to your audience and pulling them back to your web site.</p>
<p>The two benefits of PRWeb are SEO and price.  Your release will rank very well on Google and Google News, and they do distribute to many of the same sites as PR Newswire and Business Wire.  While you may not receive as many backlinks as with the two services reviewed above, you also won&#8217;t pay as much.  Distributions on PRWeb start at $80, and range up to $360.  My personal favorite is the $200 package, which offers a nice mix of cost and features.  Additionally, they don&#8217;t charge per word, so a longer release will cost the same as a short one.</p>
<p>All PRWeb releases include live links, feature quotes, and a framed view of your web site below the release text.  Starting with the $200 distribution, you can also utilize anchor text links, which help greatly with your site&#8217;s search rankings.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Budget News Release Distribution</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.onlineprnews.com/"><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://onlineprnews.com/templates/prsite/graphics/index_02.gif" alt="" width="237" height="36" /></a><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.onlineprnews.com/"><strong><br />
Online PR News (OPN)</strong></a></span><br />
Cost: $12 (free releases available)</p>
<p><em>Disclaimer: Since the last time I updated my review of online news release distribution, I have begun partnering with Online PR News on their podcasting service. I have also consulted with them on marketing in the past. In return for my consulting services, I receive complimentary distributions.</em></p>
<p>Online PR News is a relative newcomer to this stratosphere of distribution services.  Founded by two SEO content producers, the site naturally focuses on helping you publish a release that ranks well in the search engines.  The site has installed many upgrades for 2010, and has in turn raised its prices.  Free ad-supported releases are available that include one backlink, but with the low cost distribution beginning at $12, there&#8217;s no reason not to ditch the ads.</p>
<p>OPN has taken many cues from PRWeb in its release design, with each paid release receiving a pull quote and a frame below the release text that shows your web site.  Paid releases at the $12 level can also include user images, and releases at the $49 level and up can embed YouTube videos.  At the $349 level, you not only receive their maximum visibility and distribution, you also receive release editing services AND distribution via PR Newswire.</p>
<p>OPN does not yet have the push to other sites that Business Wire, PR Newswire, or PRWeb offer, but their prices are attractive and the OPN version of the release will rank very, very well on Google and Google News.  This service is definitely worth trying out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prleap.com/"><img style="border: 0pt none; margin-top: 7px;" src="http://www.prleap.com/includes/images/PRLeap.png" alt="" width="220" height="50" /><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
PR Leap</span></strong></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Distribution starting at $49<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>Started several years back as a free service, PR Leap has grown into a full service paid distribution site.  New for 2010 is a feature called PRTube that allows you to embed your release on a web site or blog using a code much like a YouTube video.  Additional services include Google News distribution, text links, and submission to (but not guaranteed usage by) outlets like the AP and UPI.  My previous experiences with PR Leap have been good ones, with their releases ranking well for my keywords.</p>
<p><a href="http://pr.com/"><img style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://www.pr.com/images/logo_m.jpg" alt="" width="99" height="97" /></a><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://pr.com/"><br />
PR.com</a></span></strong><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Distribution starting at $30 (free option available)<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>The first thing you&#8217;ll notice about PR.com is the AWESOME domain name.  It doesn&#8217;t get any better than that.  The second thing you&#8217;ll notice is a slightly confusing web site set up.  I don&#8217;t normally distribute using this service, so I in writing this review I needed to go back to check pricing information. It took about 10 minutes to find the pricing page, which is about nine minutes too many.  The major issue is that the site has lost some of its focus on release distribution and is now also posting job listings.</p>
<p>Aside from the navigation and focus issues on the site, distribution from PR.com appears to be quite solid.  After running some Google searches for releases posted there, I found that the site does help spread your release to a number of other sites.  Distribution costs start at $30, but after perusing the options at that level, it appears that you&#8217;d really need to spend $50 to get much distribution to other sites.  A free option is available, but is ad supported.</p>
<p><a href="http://prunderground.com"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1316" style="border: 0pt none;" title="prunderground" src="http://www.endgamepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/prunderground.png" alt="prunderground" width="307" height="63" /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><br />
PRUnderground</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Distribution starting at $9.95<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>PRUnderground is one of the more successful of the sites using a social media approach to distribution.  You&#8217;ll likely want to disregard the $9.95 package, as it doesn&#8217;t include much distribution and you will have ads on your release.  At the $29.95 level, the ads go away.</p>
<p>Distribution from PRUnderground focuses on channels such as Twitter, Facebook, Digg, and Moreover.  The technique seems to work, as the releases from PRUnderground that I tested by searching for them in Google did seem to get distribution beyond the PRUnderground.com site. You can also embed a YouTube video, and a preview of your web site is shown in a frame below your release text.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong>Other paid distribution services: <a href="http://marketwire.com">Marketwire</a>, <a href="http://www.prbuzz.com/">PRBuzz</a>, <a href="http://www.1888pressrelease.com/">1888PressRelease</a></strong></em></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">Free News Release Distribution</h2>
<p>Fewer and fewer sites offer quality free distribution anymore.  Here are some of the better options:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prlog.org/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PRLog</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost:</strong> Free (ad supported)<br />
Review: PRLog has been around for years, and despite the unattractive layout of the site and its releases, it&#8217;s hard to beat the rankings they achieve for releases posted at this Romanian-based site.</p>
<p>A couple of years back, PRLog branched out from news releases and started offering job listings as well (is this a trend?), which cluttered up the site considerably.  Despite my cries that I&#8217;m going to stop using the site, I keep coming back.  If you can tolerate the look and feel of the site, it’s something worth considering.  It’s one of the last truly free release distribution services that isn&#8217;t neutered, as they include a user-uploaded image, some customization (bolding and italics), and the first three links included in your release will be live.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">24-7 Press Release</span></strong></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free (ad supported), with a $49 paid option<br />
<strong>Review:</strong>24-7 Press Release is another of the sites with free options that I have on my roster for secondary distribution.  Generally for a client, I post on one of the premium paid sites such as PRWeb or Business Wire, and then I post versions of the release with different headlines on some of the free sites, such as this one.</p>
<p>One of the only major downsides to 24-7 Press Release is that they hold your release for a day or two before they post it on their site.  However, if you pay for immediate distribution, they review it pretty quickly.  Once live, your free release will rank well on Google and sometimes Google News.  Links in the release body are not an option unless you pay for the upgraded release, but a link is included in a small company profile box.  Their paid option of $49 includes enhanced SEO benefits such as anchor text for links within the release.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.wikio.com/">Wikio</a></strong></span><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>Wikio is actually meant more for articles and for sharing links, but it can also be used to post your news release content.  A voting system similar to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.digg.com/">Digg</a></span> is utilized.  When setting up your release, you can post anchor text links and format your release in many of the same ways you can when using a paid service.  There&#8217;s no additional distribution beyond the version posted on Wikio, but that version does seem to rank fairly well in Google.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://i-newswire.com/">I-Newswire</a></strong></span><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free (ad supported) with paid option<br />
<strong>Review:</strong> Going the route of many of the free release sites, I-Newswire has neutered its free options and increased its paid options.  Their free releases no longer include a link.  That will cost you $35.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.theopenpress.com/">The Open Press</a></span><br />
Cost: </strong>Free (ad supported) with a $10 paid option<br />
Review: This is a great free distribution site, with one downside &#8212; signing up is extremely ponderous.  Currently, you cannot sign up on the site.  Instead, you have to send an email and request to be registered. The explanation given is that they’ve had issues with spammers.  Once you go through that process, however, the site is very good.  It looks businesslike, and the releases posted there rank well in Google web search.  Tasteful ads are placed on your release.  They can be removed by paying $10.  The site&#8217;s owners truly review your release before posting it (unlike some sites who say they&#8217;re reviewing it, but really want you to pay for expedited distribution) and WILL reject releases that they don&#8217;t feel meet their standards.  I know this from experience.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pressreleasepoint.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PressReleasePoint</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free to post on their site (ad supported) and $15 to distribute elsewhere<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>This site sounds good on the surface &#8212; they post your release on their site for free, and for $15 they&#8217;ll post it on 50 free distribution sites.  I have not tried this service, but it concerns me.  Google’s <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66359"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">duplicate content rule</span></a> may come into play after the same content is posted on that many sites.</p>
<p>Another problem is the site itself.  Previously, it had a number of layout problems.  Some of those have been fixed in the past year, but what hasn&#8217;t been fixed is that the web site itself is riddled with grammatical and spelling errors.  My suggestion to the owners is that they have a professional copy editor go through the site with a fine-toothed comb.</p>
<p>One thing I do like on their site is the comprehensive list of more free and paid sites than I can possibly list here.  The list is found <a href="http://www.pressreleasepoint.com/paid-and-free-press-release-site-list"><strong>here</strong></a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pitchengine.com/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PitchEngine</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free (no ads)<br />
<strong>Review:</strong> PitchEngine is a bit of a conundrum for me.  The site, which features a slick social media news release format, has numerous fans.  However, while the version of the release on PitchEngine ranks rather well on Google, there&#8217;s no Google News distribution.  The site has had it in the past, but has lost it several times.  Additionally, releases posted using the free option expire after 30 days.  To have them posted permanently costs $35 per month.  To get the full benefit of the site, with a custom newsroom and permanent hosting, will cost you $50 per month.  I&#8217;m not certain what happens if you pay your subscription for a year, post releases, and then decide not to renew.  If anyone can tell me whether those releases then expire or not, I&#8217;d be happy to update this review.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that while PitchEngine has many loyal fans, I&#8217;m not really one of them.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Other free distribution sites: <strong><a href="http://pr-usa.net">PR-USA</a></strong>, <a href="http://www.postafreepressrelease.com/"><strong>PostaFreePressRelease</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.express-press-release.com/"><strong>Express Press Release</strong></a></em></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">The Best of the Best</h2>
<p>So, which of these sites do I think are the BEST?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Premium Release Distribution: PRWeb and Business Wire (Tie)<br />
</strong>It&#8217;s hard for me to pick between these two, so I&#8217;m taking the easy way out.  PRWeb does a better job of ensuring your release ranks well and generates some backlinks.  Business Wire, however, will make sure your release receives loads of backlinks.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Budget Release Distribution: Online PR News<br />
</strong>With budget distribution services, you normally won&#8217;t get a lot of distribution, so I&#8217;m judging how well the version of the release on the distribution site ranks on Google and Google News.  OPN gets you VERY good rankings with both, and they&#8217;re continuing to expand their offerings.<br />
<em>(Honorable Mention: PRUnderground)</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Free Release Distribution: PRLog<br />
</strong>I keep trying to replace them on this list because I wish they&#8217;d do something to clean up their site, but it&#8217;s hard to argue with a free release service that offers their features, and will get your release excellent search rankings.<br />
<em>(Honorable Mention: Wikio)</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Disagree?  Agree? Want to talk about another distribution service (preferably not one you work for)?  Please let me know about it in comments!</strong></p>
<p><em>If you appreciate the work it took to compile these reviews, please be sure to &#8220;retweet&#8221; it using the button at the top of the page, or post it on one of the services below!</em><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2010/02/22/news-release-distribution-review-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No More Free Google News from PitchEngine</title>
		<link>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2009/05/31/no-more-google-news-from-pitchengine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2009/05/31/no-more-google-news-from-pitchengine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 04:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mullen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news release distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endgamepr.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re a fan of PitchEngine for online distribution of news releases, as I have been, you likely already know about the announcement this evening.  For those who don&#8217;t &#8212; the owners of the site announced that they will no longer include free releases on the feed that goes to Google.  What this means is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re a fan of <a href="http://www.pitchengine.com"><strong>PitchEngine</strong></a> for online distribution of news releases, as I have been, you likely already know about the <a href="http://blog.pitchengine.com/?page_id=164"><strong>announcement this evening</strong></a>.  For those who don&#8217;t &#8212; the owners of the site announced that they will no longer include free releases on the feed that goes to Google.  What this means is that these free releases will not rank on Google News.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a portion of the announcement:</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve recently been targeted by spammers who are using our tool solely as a means to affect their Google rank, which is simply not in the best interest of our users, especially our paid subscribers. While it&#8217;s been a great asset for our users, it&#8217;s simply not going to work if this content goes unregulated. We&#8217;re also going to step up our SMR and brand authentication efforts to maintain the validity of content hitting our feeds &#8211; even for paid subscribers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Releases from those who subscribe, <em>and pay $35 per month</em>, will continue to have releases streamed to Google News.</p>
<p>I realize that nothing stays free on the Interwebs for long these days, but PitchEngine was an outstanding free way to create and make available attractive social media releases.  Now, because the management of the site wasn&#8217;t able to police submissions properly, no one gets to take full advantage unless they pay.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already seen on <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=pitchengine"><strong>Twitter</strong></a> a bit of a backlash to the decision, and some support of it.  The response from one of PitchEngine&#8217;s site builders to the critics has been to say the spammers are to blame, and that the move adds to the value of the paid service.</p>
<p>Spammers are not going away and they don&#8217;t care what you think, so if you blame them for anything, you&#8217;re  wasting your breath.  They&#8217;re like the common cold in that way.  And, as with the common cold, taking a few precautions will help reduce the chance of  &#8220;infection&#8221;.  Changing the way you do everything seems a bit extreme.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>Note: I&#8217;ve updated my ongoing Review of <a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/10/23/online-news-release-distribution-review-updated/"><strong>Online News Release Sites</strong></a> to reflect this change in policy.</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2009/05/31/no-more-google-news-from-pitchengine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The SEO Value of Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/10/24/the-seo-value-of-press-releases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/10/24/the-seo-value-of-press-releases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mullen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO PR Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news release distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo pr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endgamepr.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jiyan Wei, a product manager from PRWeb, posted this week on his blog a great overview of press releases and SEO.  He runs through the history of SEO as it relates to release distribution, and gives a number of recommendations on how to write a release that will help your site&#8217;s search rankings. Jiyan mentioned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jiyan Wei, a product manager from <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.prweb.com">PRWeb</a></span>, posted this week on his blog a great overview of <a href="http://www.newinfluencer.com/press-releases-seo/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">press releases and SEO</span></a>.  He runs through the history of SEO as it relates to release distribution, and gives a number of recommendations on how to write a release that will help your site&#8217;s search rankings.</p>
<p>Jiyan mentioned that he&#8217;d been getting a lot of questions about the SEO value of news release distribution.  I suspect that many of the questions came from attendees of the PRWeb webinar in which I presented on Wednesday.  I know we got a lot of them during the session.  I told Jiyan through Twitter that his blog post was a wonderful overview on the topic and is one that I&#8217;ve been meaning to write.  Now I don&#8217;t have to!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/10/24/the-seo-value-of-press-releases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Release Distribution Review UPDATED</title>
		<link>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/10/23/online-news-release-distribution-review-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/10/23/online-news-release-distribution-review-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mullen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO PR Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news release distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo pr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endgamepr.com/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOTICE: This review is now out of date!  Please check out my updated review for 2010: News Release Distribution Review 2010 One of the most popular blog posts on this site is my April, 2007 review of online news release distribution services. Because this review is so popular, I feel a responsibility to keep it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>NOTICE: This review is now out of date!  Please check out my updated review for 2010:</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2010/02/22/news-release-distribution-review-2010/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">News Release Distribution Review 2010</span></a></strong></span></p>
<p>One of the most popular blog posts on this site is my April, 2007 <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2007/04/14/review-online-news-release-distribution-services/">review of online news release distribution services</a></span>. Because this review is so popular, I feel a responsibility to keep it updated.  I last updated the original post in September, and since then I&#8217;ve been promising a complete overhaul.  Now &#8230; here it is!</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span id="more-196"></span></span></p>
<p>Before we get to the review, I should provide an overview of what online news release distribution can do for you.  When you post a release on a good news release distribution service, they not only place the text of your release (along with a link to your site) on their website, but they also put your release in their RSS feeds.  Those feeds are picked up by media outlets and websites, and are used as content.  Some release distribution services also have digests that are sent to reporters.</p>
<p>There are two major benefits to news release distribution.  One is that it&#8217;s a way to distribute your release to the media.  The second is related to search engine optimization (SEO).  When another website posts your release, including the link back to your website, you get a link back to your site.  These links, known as backlinks, are viewed by search engines as votes.  The more quality backlinks you have, the higher you generally rank.  I generally recommend that businesses write and distribute a news release once per month as part of their link gathering efforts.</p>
<p>So, now that we know why you should be using this strategy, let&#8217;s discuss which service you should use.  I&#8217;m going to break this review into two parts &#8212; the pay services and the free services.  We&#8217;ll do the pay services first.  In each case, I&#8217;ll try to point out changes from my last review.  It&#8217;s not my goal to hit every single service in this review, as there are dozens of them.  If you have one you&#8217;d like to discuss, please talk about it in comments!</p>
<h2>Paid News Release Distribution</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com"><img style="border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px;" src="http://media.prnewswire.com/en/images/topbar/prn_logo.gif" alt="" width="132" height="86" /></a><strong><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com"></a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PR Newswire (PRN)</span></a> </strong><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Varies, starting at $180 for a 400 word release<br />
<strong></strong><strong>Review:</strong> PR Newswire has been around in one form or another for more than 50 years.   They market themselves as being a mainstay among reporters and news organizations.   Out of all of the distribution services, theirs is the one that would most likely lead to news coverage for your release.  They also do a good job of distributing your release for use on other websites.  Your release will rank highly on Google News for your keywords, and you&#8217;ll get plenty of quality backlinks.</p>
<p>The problem with PR Newswire is cost.  They have a yearly fee that you have to pay for the priviledge of paying more to post your releases.  I was told in a conversation with PRN&#8217;s president some weeks ago that they&#8217;re willing to waive that fee for small businesses, but everyone else has to pay $150 per year in addition to any other distribution fees.   Releases start at $180 for distribution on their city or state wire.  That&#8217;s for a short release of 450 words, though, and they charge you for each word after that.   At that price, the distribution to the media is limited.  If you want distribution to nationwide media, you&#8217;ll pay around $600 for a single release.  With all of this said, I do think PR Newswire does a great job getting the word out to the media, and as I&#8217;ll say in a number of cases during this review &#8212; you get what you pay for.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prweb.com"><img style="border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px;" src="http://ww1.prweb.com/images_v4/prw_logo.jpg" alt="" width="163" height="51" /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong></strong></span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.prweb.com"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PRWeb</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost:</strong> Packages range from $80 to $360<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>PRWeb has taken a different focus than PR Newswire.  While PR Newswire focuses on the media relations portion of the online distribution equation, PRWeb focuses more on the search engine optimization and link gathering benefits, and they do it very well.  It&#8217;s been my experience that if you post with them, you&#8217;ll get your backlinks &#8230; sometimes from some heavy hitters.    Plus, the release posted on their site will rank fairly highly in the search rankings and on Google News.   They don&#8217;t have quite the standing with journalists as PR Newswire, but they&#8217;re becoming more and more well known and they do have an additional package that include a special reporter distribution.  The big benefit of PRWeb is cost.  Pricing for basic PRWeb distribution starts at $80, and goes up to $360.  For what you get, I believe those prices are reasonable.</p>
<p>They have other additional services that cost more, like their brand new online newsroom.  I was offered a free trial of their newsroom service, and it&#8217;s a pretty good way to have all of your releases in one place, particularly if you don&#8217;t have the space on your own site to post all of them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businesswire.com"></a><a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bw-logo.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-495" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="bw-logo" src="http://www.endgamepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bw-logo.jpg" alt="bw-logo" width="194" height="86" /></a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com"><strong>BusinessWire</strong></a></span><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Varies, starting at $180 for the first 400 words<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>BusinessWire seems to be trying to straddle the space between PRWeb and PR Newswire, offering SEO optimized news releases as well as good media distribution, and they&#8217;re doing a good job of both.  Generally, online news release distribution is NOT the best way to get media coverage.  I counsel clients to use it for link building, and if media coverage results then it&#8217;s a bonus.  A basic release from BusinessWire will generate quality links for your release, and plenty of them.  One thing I noticed, however, was that the basic release itself didn&#8217;t rank very well on the search engines.  You expect an established paid service like BusinessWire to rank above free release services, and that wasn&#8217;t the case.</p>
<p>BusinessWire breaks its distribution into levels based on what media will be informed about your release.  The national distribution is the most expensive, with state and city distribution below that.  I recommend looking at the cost of citywide distribution versus state.  There may not be a considerable difference between the two, so the state distribution might be worth the few extra dollars.</p>
<p>BusinessWire offers a fully optimized release that is similar to the one offered by PRWeb.  The distribution, called <a href="http://eon.businesswire.com"><strong>EON</strong></a>, was originally developed in partnership with PRWeb&#8217;s parent company. This release costs an additional $225 above and beyond the regular price of distribution.</p>
<p>While I am very impressed with the number of backlinks generated by BusinessWire releases, time will tell whether they take PRWeb&#8217;s top spot for SEO releases.  The primary issue is cost and the lack of a quality ranking for the BusinessWire version of the release.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.onlineprnews.com"><img class="alignnone" style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://onlineprnews.com/templates/prsite/graphics/index_02.gif" alt="" width="237" height="36" /></a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.onlineprnews.com"><strong>Online PR News</strong></a></span><br />
Cost: $6 (free releases available)<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>I was contacted by a representative of Online PR News months ago, and was offered a tryout of their service.  It took me a while to get around to taking advantage of that offer, and I wish I&#8217;d done it sooner.  Online PR News offers many of the same search engine optimization features of PRWeb, but at a very small fraction of the price.  With your $6 release, you get anchor text links, a preview pane of your website, pull quotes, the standard social bookmarking shortcuts, and the ability to embed images, videos, and slideshows.  All of these features add up to a well optimized and sticky release.  I&#8217;m very impressed.  They offer a free release option, but it does not include anchor text links or the ability to embed videos or slideshows.</p>
<p>Distribution appears to be good for the price.  The Online PR News version of my release ranked well on Google and Google News, and it did spread to at least one other website &#8230; which is obviously one of the goals of online news release distribution.</p>
<p>I struggled over whether to include Online PR News in the free section, but the low price they&#8217;re requesting is well within any budget.  I will definitely be utilizing their services in the future.</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #ff0000;">DISCLOSURE (added 10/1/09): I have done some consulting for OPN, and have since formed a loose partnership with them.  I&#8217;ll be announcing more about this in the coming days and/or months.  This review was written before I had any relationship with the owners of the site.</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.prleap.com"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.prleap.com/includes/images/PRLeap.png" alt="" width="220" height="50" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.prleap.com"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PR Leap</span></strong></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Distribution starting at $49.99<br />
<strong></strong><strong>Review: </strong>This site was included in the free services last time around, but they have discontinued that free option <em>(NOTE: This is a change from the last review!)</em>.  Their basic distribution is now $49.99.</p>
<p>PR Leap has always been a good option for online distribution, and it&#8217;s a shame they discontinued the free option.  But, if you&#8217;re looking for a less expensive service or perhaps a second site to post on, you should look into their service.  Their releases are usually picked up by Google News and rank fairly well.  They&#8217;ve put some attention into SEO, and it shows.  I don&#8217;t believe they&#8217;re great at getting the word directly to reporters, but, bear in mind that reporters do use search engines to look for sources for stories.  So, if your release is out there and ranks well, there&#8217;s the chance it could lead to coverage.</p>
<p><a href="http://pr.com"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.pr.com/images/logo_m.jpg" alt="" width="99" height="97" /></a></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://PR.com">PR.com</a></span></strong><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Distribution starting at $29.99<br />
<strong></strong><strong>Review: </strong>PR.com is a service that wasn&#8217;t included in the last review.  I love the domain name, of course, and their site appears very professional.  You&#8217;ll find in many cases the low cost or free services look like spam sites, and in some cases they actually are.  That isn&#8217;t the case with PR.com.  I&#8217;ll be honest, i haven&#8217;t used this service yet, but I did some research into what they offer and how well their releases rank, and I&#8217;m reasonably impressed.</p>
<p>PR.com does have a free option, but I wouldn&#8217;t recommend bothering to use it.  The free option will not include an active link from the release back to your site.  Their basic distribution is $29.99 and includes links within the release.  They claim to usually get inclusion in Google News and, from what I can see that&#8217;s true.   They&#8217;re probably worth checking out as another low cost alternative to the bigger guys.  I probably will consider them in the future.</p>
<h2>Free News Release Distribution</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.pitchengine.com"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PitchEngine</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free (no ads)<br />
<strong>Review:</strong> PitchEngine allows you to easily create social media press releases, complete with videos, images, supplementary information and links, and even a Twitter pitch!</p>
<p>When you sign up for the site and post your first release, you&#8217;re asked to create a profile for the organization behind the release.  This can be somewhat time-consuming if you post releases for a number of different organizations.  However, the way that information is used is very slick.  On your final release, there will be a slide-down tab on the top with all of the info you enter about the org.</p>
<p>The only issue I have with PitchEngine is the system of entering your release.  It&#8217;s mildly ponderous, but can be overlooked &#8230; given the price.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>Edited on 5/30/09 to add: Pitchengine announced today that they are removing free releases from the feed that goes to Google.  What this means is that free releases are no longer eligible for inclusion in Google News.  The site&#8217;s owners say this is because spammers were using the site for SEO reasons. </em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>Edited on 10/30/09 to add: It&#8217;s come to my attention that NO PitchEngine releases are currently being indexed by Google News.  This includes those posted by paying subscribers.  I&#8217;m told it&#8217;s a temporary issue.  You can read  PitchEngine founder Jason Kintzler&#8217;s response and explanation in the comments of <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2009/05/31/no-more-google-news-from-pitchengine/"><strong>this post</strong></a></span>.<br />
</em></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.24-7pressrelease.com"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">24-7 Press Release</span></strong></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free (ad supported), with a $49 paid option<br />
<strong>Review:</strong> 24-7 Press Release does a good job of free distribution.  I&#8217;m not fond of the name at all, as it sounds a bit low rent, but they do a good job.   They have free and paid options, and a professional looking site.  I&#8217;ve seen that their releases rank well for a free site &#8230; which is the most you can ask for from a free site.  Generally, you will NOT get Google News inclusion from a free site.  Their free option does not include a link within the release, but they will include one in a contact information box that&#8217;s on the page.  They have a paid option of $49, which includes enhanced SEO benefits such as anchor text for links within the release.</p>
<p>24-7 Press Release does review all releases before they&#8217;re released.   Now, this is a pain if you&#8217;re in a hurry, but presumably this means they&#8217;re filtering out the ones that are truly spam.  Or, it could be that they&#8217;re trying to get you to pay for quicker distribution.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prlog.org"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PRLog</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost:</strong> Free (ad supported)<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>This is a site that i had some very nice things to say about in the original review.   Unfortunately, that&#8217;s not the case any longer.  This Bulgarian-based site has gone in the wrong direction, in my opinion. The site has started accepting job listings and they&#8217;ve added quite a few unattractive elements to the site in general.  With all of the additions, the site has become confusing and looks a great deal like a spam site.   A lot of the releases you&#8217;ll find on the front page are not so much releases as poorly written blog posts.  It&#8217;s obvious that there&#8217;s little quality control, and they were concerned that they weren&#8217;t getting enough traffic.  Unfortunately, it also appears that their releases are no longer being indexed by Google News.</p>
<p>With all of this said, release from PRLog still rank very well on Google.  If you can tolerate the look and feel of the site, it&#8217;s something worth considering.  It&#8217;s free, so you don&#8217;t have any money to lose.  And, with the decision by PitchEngine to neuter its free service, PRLog is looking more attractive.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://i-newswire.com/">I-Newswire</a></strong></span><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free (ad supported) with a $25 paid option<br />
<strong>Review:</strong> This is another good free distribution site that has a paid option.  Their service is similar to 24-7 Press Release in that the site looks professional.  They allow you one link within your release, and have additional options in their $25 paid option.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.theopenpress.com">The Open Press</a><br />
Cost: </strong>Free (ad supported) with a $10 paid option<br />
Review: This is a great free distribution site, with one downside.  Signing up is extremely ponderous.  Currently, you cannot sign up on the site, but rather you have to send an email and request to be registered. The explanation given is that they&#8217;ve had issues with spammers.  Once you go through that process, however, the site is very good.  It looks businesslike, and the releases posted there rank well in Google web search.  Tasteful ads are placed on your release, which can be removed by paying $10.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.wikio.com">Wikio</a></strong></span><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>This site is a bit different in that it takes more of a social networking approach to news release distribution.  Releases are voted for, similar to the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a></span> system.  They&#8217;re worth checking out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pressreleasepoint.com"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>PressReleasePoint</strong></span></a><br />
<strong>Cost: </strong>Free to post on their site (ad supported) and $15 to distribute elsewhere<br />
<strong>Review: </strong>This site has another different concept.  You can not only post a release on the PressReleasePoint site, but but for $15 they claim to be able to post your release on more than 50 other free distribution sites.  I&#8217;ve not tried the service, but I must admit that what they offer is interesting.</p>
<p>I do have some concerns about the site and the concept for this service.    The first is that Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66359"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">duplicate content rule</span></a> may come into play after the same content is posted on that many sites.  Another problem is the layout of the site.  The text in the releases frequently ends up ON TOP of the advertising on the site.  My final concern is a big one, as it has to do with credibility.  The text on the website itself (not just the releases posted by users) is riddled with grammatical errors.  It appears to be written by someone without a good grasp of the English language.  My suggestion to the owners is that they have a professional copy editor go through the site with a fine-toothed comb.</p>
<h2>The Best of the Best</h2>
<p>So, which of these sites are the BEST?</p>
<p><strong>For SEO: PRWeb</strong><br />
PRWeb has the best mix of available SEO options, and their prices are reasonable.</p>
<p><strong>For Media Visibility: PR Newswire</strong><br />
It&#8217;s hard to beat PR Newswire&#8217;s reputation among journalists and the media distribution they offer.</p>
<p><strong>For Free Distribution: PRLog</strong><br />
Despite unfortunate decisions from the ownership of the site, releases rank very well on Google &#8230; which in the end is the name of the game for SEO PR.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mention: Online PR News</strong><br />
It&#8217;s hard to know where to rank this site.  It&#8217;s not a free site, but their $6 price is extremely manageable. Regardless of what you call them, the features they offer are outstanding for the price, and the releases rank well.</p>
<h2>Now &#8230; Discuss!</h2>
<p>Disagree?  Agree?  Did I miss one I shouldn&#8217;t have?  Discuss in comments below!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/10/23/online-news-release-distribution-review-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Releases: Poorly Written Blog Posts?</title>
		<link>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/09/13/news-releases-poorly-written-blog-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/09/13/news-releases-poorly-written-blog-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mullen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news release distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endgamepr.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just happened upon a post written by Richard MacManus on ReadWriteWeb, a very popular technology blog, about the inclusion of online news release distributer BusinessWire on the Techmeme &#8220;leader board&#8220;.  The leader board lists the top sources posted to Techmeme.  MacManus was discussing how Business Wire&#8216;s news releases were competing successfully with bloggers for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-183" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 3px; float: left;" title="Image courtesy skinnymoose.com" src="http://www.endgamepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/blogging-tshirt.jpg" alt="Image: I'm Blogging This" width="140" height="183" />I just happened upon a post <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pr_wire_services_blogs_journalism.php">written by Richard MacManus on ReadWriteWeb</a></span>, a very popular technology blog, about the inclusion of online news release distributer BusinessWire on the Techmeme &#8220;<a href="http://www.techmeme.com/lb"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">leader board</span></a>&#8220;.  The leader board lists the top sources posted to Techmeme.  MacManus was discussing how <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/">Business Wire</a></span>&#8216;s news releases were competing successfully with bloggers for attention.  Note that PR Newswire, another online press release newswire, is also included rather high on the Techmeme list.<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>What struck me about this post is a comment from Techmeme&#8217;s founder, Gabe Rivera:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span id="more-181"></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><em>I asked Techmeme founder Gabe Rivera what he thought of Business Wire ranking #32 on the Techmeme Leaderboard. Gabe replied that this in itself &#8220;isn&#8217;t a problem.&#8221; He told me that &#8220;press releases are kind of like poorly-written company blog posts, which also have a place on Techmeme. That said, I wish Techmeme at times did a better job at elevating good blog posts above the press releases they discuss.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>I asked Gabe if people actually read press releases from the likes of Business Wire. &#8220;Sometimes people want just-the-facts&#8221;, said Gabe, &#8220;Some PR Newswire releases are in fact remarkable reads&#8221;. He pointed to <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080211/p147#a080211p147">this recent story</a> about Microsoft&#8217;s bid for Yahoo (screenshot below). But, Gabe noted, &#8220;many others are less so, and better retold by blogs like RWW.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Is Rivera actually saying blog writing is somehow superior to news release writing?  That&#8217;s like saying songwriting is better than textbook writing.  That&#8217;s a bit of an exaggeration, but the point I&#8217;m trying to make is that blog writing and news release writing are two different styles.  Good news releases aren&#8217;t written in blog post style.  While I&#8217;m an advocate of using less print-style writing (I&#8217;m not much for true AP Style, even when I&#8217;m writing news releases), I actually suggest writers use more of a broadcast television style.  It&#8217;s something of a happy medium between &#8230; say &#8230; The Wall Street Journal and Gizmodo.  And, just because news releases aren&#8217;t written exactly the way Mr. Rivera would write them, doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;re written poorly.</p>
<p>Back to the point of the ReadWriteWeb post: News releases DO have a place in online discussion, as Mr. MacManus concluded.  As public relation professionals use the web to target their information at the actual public, rather than using the media as an intermediary, their releases will be quoted more as sources by non-traditional media.  It&#8217;s a natural progression.  Well written (and even some of the poorly written) news releases can be a fabulous source for blogs and other social media outlets.</p>
<p>Plug alert: Check out the latest <a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/news/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">EndGame PR news releases</span></a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2008/09/13/news-releases-poorly-written-blog-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Online News Release Distribution Services</title>
		<link>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2007/04/14/review-online-news-release-distribution-services/</link>
		<comments>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2007/04/14/review-online-news-release-distribution-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 04:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Mullen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EndGame PR Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Relations Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO PR Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news release distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.endgamepr.com/wordpress/2007/04/14/review-online-news-release-distribution-services/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOTICE: This review is now out of date!  Please check out my updated review for 2010: News Release Distribution Review 2010 I read recently that the online news release distribution business is booming, and that certainly explains the explosion in the number of companies jumping into the fray. Generally speaking, online release distribution services take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>NOTICE: This review is now out of date!  Please check out my updated review for 2010:</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2010/02/22/news-release-distribution-review-2010/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">News Release Distribution Review 2010</span></a></strong></span></p>
<p>I read recently that the online news release distribution business is booming, and that certainly explains the explosion in the number of companies jumping into the fray.  Generally speaking, online release distribution services take your release, post it on their site, and then distribute it via RSS feed to other sites that use the releases for content.  Other services also distribute your release directly to reporters via different means.  Communications professionals use online news distribution for many different reasons, but they generally fall into two categories&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>1) </strong>Media relations professionals want to put the release in front of reporters, via distribution service reporter feeds.<br />
<strong> 2) </strong><a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/seo-pr">SEO PR</a> professionals want to put the release in front of consumers and build backlinks, via distribution service news RSS feeds</p>
<p>So, which is the best place to distribute your <a href="http://www.endgamepr.com/news">news releases</a> to reach the above goals?  Below is a review of what I consider the best of the best, both free and paid.   Feed free to add your own via comments!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com" target="_blank">PR Newswire</a><br />
News feed distribution: $180 and up<br />
Free option: None</strong><br />
PR Newswire is the granddad of the group, starting out more or less as a way to distribute your release directly to reporters via old fashioned newswires.  They&#8217;re still the best at getting your releases in front of mass numbers of journalists.  Releases placed on PRN not only appear online, but also are distributed via a portion of the Associated Press Newswire.  PRN also has lists of reporters who receive news on selected industries via email.</p>
<p>Where PR Newswire falls short is search engine optimization.  They just don&#8217;t seem to understand optimizing online news releases.  They will still get you a number of links due to being an industry giant, however, they could be better.  An option is available to have PRN optimize your release, but I wouldn&#8217;t recommend it.  To take advantage you must first purchase their top distribution, which costs a minimum of $680.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.prweb.com" target="_blank">PRWeb</a><br />
News feed distribution: $80 and up<br />
Free option: None</strong><br />
PRWeb was the first release distribution service to fully embrace news release optimization, or at the very least they were the one who promoted it best.   Until last fall they had a free option that was outstanding, but it was eliminated shortly after they were purchased by Vocus.  These days they have essentially three pricing levels &#8211; $80, $120, and $200.  Different services are available at the different levels, but all three include some type of news feed distribution.  A new product was announced last month that offers distribution via the same Associated Press wire that PR Newswire uses.  This &#8220;Media Visibility&#8221; package includes online distribution as well as the media distribution, and costs $360.</p>
<p>Releases on PRWeb are more fully optimized for search engines and social media than any I&#8217;ve found.  They include features such as links to social bookmarking sites such as Digg and Technorati, category listings, and a proprietary trackback system.  If approved, your release appears on PRWeb&#8217;s sister site, eMediawire, which automatically gives you a second backlink.  Their stats at the $120 and $200 level are impressive as well.  One irritation I do have with them is that at the $80 and $120 pricing levels there is a two day delay before your release is distributed.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.prleap.com" target="_blank">PRLeap</a><br />
News feed distribution: $50 and up<br />
Free option: <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Available</span></strong> <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>DISCONTINUED</strong></span><br />
PRLeap essentially wants to be PRWeb.  It&#8217;s not a bad thing to desire, as PRWeb has been very successful.  However, they just don&#8217;t seem to get there.  Their pricing is good, but my experience is that link building via PRLeap isn&#8217;t as affective as PRWeb.  One huge advantage they do have is that they have a free option.  I do recommend taking advantage of that, as posting is quick and easy.  Free releases have reasonably unobtrusive ads placed on them. Anchor text links are available starting at $20, however at that level the release is placed on the PRLeap site, but not distributed via news feeds.</p>
<p><em>[Edited September 2, 2008: PRLeap discontinued their free option effective the first of this year.  Their paid options are $49, $99, and $149 ... with different options available for each.  I can't believe I missed the elimination of their free option, but it's probably because I haven't used PRLeap for quite a while.  I was actually planning to try it out tomorrow, given my distaste with the changes at PRLog, but if I'm going to pay for a release I'm going to pay for PRWeb.  At this moment, I'm considering a switch over to using 24-7 Press Release (see below) when I'm only planning to post in one place.]</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.prlog.org" target="_blank">PRLog</a><br />
News feed distribution: Free<br />
Free option: Available (ads included on releases)</strong><br />
A new entrant into the field, PRLog is quickly making a reputation for a free way to create a quality backlink.  My experience with the service is that releases posted on their site are always indexed very high by Google.  Recently I had a free PRLog release actually rank above a paid PRLeap release on Google News!  My theory on this is that it&#8217;s because PRLog has a <em>.org</em> URL<em> </em>instead of the<em> </em><em>.com</em> you would expect.  As you may know, .org addresses are automatically given special consideration by the search engines.  Regardless, the site provides outstanding performance for a free service.  I haven&#8217;t noticed a large number of additional backlinks created by using PRLog, but a top ranking on Google News will do that for itself for many searches.</p>
<p>With every release, PRLog includes links to bookmark on social media sites like Digg and Technorati.  They also give you the option of linking to long URLs that include your release title, or non-optimized URLS that are slightly easier to remember.  PRLog also allows you to upload a logo or image for your release.</p>
<p><em>[Updated August 13, 2008: I've posted a couple of releases on PRLog lately, and frankly I'm not liking the direction this service is going.  The site is looking rather "spammy" these days, and they're now accepting job listings in addition to news releases.  Not good.  I'm still thinking about it, but it looks as though PRLog may be losing grip on its "favorite" status.] </em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://express-press-release.com/" target="_blank">Express Press Release Distribution</a><br />
News feed distribution: Free<br />
Free option: Available</strong><br />
Express Press Release offers free release distribution with no frills and no links included.  They also have $29 distribution that includes link activation and improved placement on the site.  In the interest of full disclosure, I&#8217;ve never used the pay service.  However, despite the lack of links I&#8217;ve actually found good search results for their free service.  Two releases I placed their for my <a href="http://www.endgamepr.com">PR firm</a> have popped up for my primary search target for months.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/" target="_blank">24-7 Press Release</a><br />
News feed distribution: $45 and up<br />
Free option: Available (ads included on releases)</strong><br />
Like Express Press Release, I have only used the free option on 24-7 Press Release.  However, the results have been good.  Generally my releases have been indexed on Google News, and some have ended up on the news site Topix.  24-7 is trying to nudge into the PR Newswire world by offering what they call &#8220;Mass Media Distribution&#8221; for $299 (releases with more than 375 words cost more).  This service claims direct distribution to trade publications, as well as 80,000 individual journalists.  If anyone has tried this out, let me know how it worked for you!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.prnewsnow.com" target="_blank">PR News Now</a><br />
News feed distribution: Free<br />
Free option: Available (ads included on releases)</strong><br />
I hesitated to include this one because it has the appearance of a spam site, to be honest.  However, I&#8217;ve used the site and found that my releases there do rank for target searches.  Releases posted on their site are littered with ads, and they don&#8217;t look terribly professional.  But, for SEO purposes, they&#8217;re beneficial.</p>
<p><em>[Update from 2/14/08: I've been meaning to post for a while that you may actually find your PRWeb releases popping up on PR News Now, much to the chagrin of the PRWeb folks.  PR News Now is apparently taking PRWeb feeds and reposting them without attribution and sometimes without even including the links.  I've decided I'm staying away from this service.]</em></p>
<p><strong>Others:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.wikio.com" target="_blank">Wikio</a>: A site built specifically for people to post articles and releases.  It&#8217;s painfully easy to use.<br />
<a href="http://searchwarp.com" target="_blank">SearchWarp</a>: More for articles than news releases but, at least with the way I write, it&#8217;s not tough to turn a release into something that looks like an article.<br />
<a href="http://www.i-newswire.com/" target="_blank">I-Newswire</a>: Another site much like PRLog, 24-7 Press Release, and PRLeap.  I&#8217;ve had fairly good results posting free releases here.</p>
<p>There are many, many, many others.  But, which are the best?  Here are the Media Relations &amp; SEO PR Blog <em>Best Bets</em>:</p>
<p><strong>For reporter distribution: PR Newswire</strong><br />
Despite being chocked full of news releases, PR Newswire actually has a reputation among journalists as being a good place to find story leads.</p>
<p><strong>For link building: PRWeb</strong><br />
No one beats PRWeb for the number of links generated from one release.  Period.</p>
<p><strong>For free release distribution: PRLog</strong><br />
I&#8217;ve been extremely impressed  with the tools offered by PRLog, and the results I&#8217;ve gained by using them.  I have a sneaking suspicion they&#8217;re going to launch a paid service soon, and I&#8217;ll be trying it out.</p>
<p>As I said earlier, I&#8217;d love to hear about your success stories using services I didn&#8217;t mention.  Lay them on me in comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.endgamepr.com/blog/2007/04/14/review-online-news-release-distribution-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
